LLaMA 3.2 vs. LLaMA 3.1 vs. Gemma 2: Finding the Best Open-Source LLM for Content Creation

RayRay
9 min readOct 2, 2024

Finding the right open-source LLM for content creation can be a treasure hunt. With so many models popping up, each promising to be the next big thing, it’s easy to get lost in the details. So, let’s skip the jargon and talk about why LLaMA 3.2 (3B parameters) might be the sweet spot for content creators and AI enthusiasts.

🧩 What’s the Deal with These LLMs?

I have compared 3 LLM’s based on their output.

LLaMA 3.1 (8B Parameters): Consider it a solid starting point. It’s great for general tasks, but the size (8 billion parameters) can be sluggish on less powerful hardware. This is a reliable option if you’re looking for a model that can handle complex tasks and are OK with waiting a bit longer. But in terms of speed and efficiency, it feels heavy. 😅

LLaMA 3.2 (3B Parameters): Here’s where things get interesting! With just 3 billion parameters, this version delivers outputs very close to LLaMA 3.1 (8B) while being way faster and lighter. It’s like getting top-tier performance without the bulk. On my MSI Legion laptop (Intel Core Ultra 9, RTX 4070, 64GB RAM), LLaMA 3.2 handles tasks seamlessly, whereas LLaMA 3.1 would take longer. The fact that this model can deliver almost the same quality…

--

--

RayRay

I’m a 🇳🇱 lead frontend developer who writes about WebDev | JavaScript | TypeScript | Vuejs | Web Components | Design Systems | NuxtJS | StencilJS | CSS